A massive administrative exercise to verify beneficiaries of the "Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana" in Maharashtra has led to the shocking revelation that nearly 26 lakh beneficiaries may be ineligible. This staggering number has triggered a major political controversy, with the opposition alleging a massive scam and demanding a thorough investigation. The state government, while acknowledging the preliminary findings, has initiated a physical verification process to confirm the ineligibility of these individuals.
The Ladki Bahin Yojana: A Pillar of Women's Empowerment
Launched with great fanfare in Maharashtra, the "Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana" was envisioned as a flagship financial assistance scheme for women. The program aims to empower women by providing a monthly stipend of ₹1,500 to those from economically disadvantaged families. The eligibility criteria are well-defined:
- Age: The beneficiary must be a woman between the ages of 21 and 65.
- Marital Status: The scheme is primarily for married women, including those who are widowed, divorced, or abandoned.
- Residency: The woman must be a resident of Maharashtra.
- Income: The annual family income must be ₹2.5 lakh or less.
- Other Restrictions: The beneficiary or any member of her family must not be a government employee (regular, permanent, or contractual), a pensioner, or a taxpayer. The scheme also prohibits beneficiaries from receiving benefits from multiple government schemes if the combined benefit exceeds a certain limit.
The scheme, which was a key promise of the ruling Mahayuti alliance, was instrumental in its landslide victory in the 2024 assembly elections. It was seen as a game-changer, promising to alleviate financial burdens and improve the social status of millions of women across the state.
The Alarming Revelation: 26 Lakh Names Flagged
The controversy erupted after the state's Information and Technology (IT) Department conducted a preliminary analysis of the beneficiary list. Using data matching and advanced analytics, the department found that approximately 26 lakh individuals currently receiving benefits under the scheme did not meet the eligibility criteria.
The findings were confirmed by Maharashtra's Women and Child Development Minister, Aditi Tatkare. In a public statement, she announced that the IT department had provided preliminary information flagging a significant number of beneficiaries. The reasons for their ineligibility were multi-faceted and included:
- Family Income Exceeding the Limit: A large number of beneficiaries were found to be from families with an annual income over ₹2.5 lakh, making them ineligible.
- Government Employment or Pension: Some individuals or their family members were employed in government departments, public sector undertakings, or were receiving pensions, which disqualifies them from the scheme.
- Duplicate Benefits: A number of women were found to be beneficiaries of other government welfare schemes, violating the one-scheme-per-beneficiary rule.
- Incorrect Marital Status: The scheme is intended for married, widowed, divorced, or abandoned women, but the scrutiny revealed discrepancies in marital status for some beneficiaries.
- Male Beneficiaries: In a particularly shocking finding, the government’s initial data revealed that a significant number of men had fraudulently enrolled themselves in the scheme, a clear violation of the "Ladli Bahin" (beloved sister) title.
- Age Discrepancies: Some beneficiaries were found to be outside the eligible age group of 21 to 65 years.
Political Fallout and Public Scrutiny
The revelation has triggered a political firestorm. The opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) has seized on the issue, accusing the government of large-scale irregularities and a scam amounting to thousands of crores of rupees. Supriya Sule, a prominent leader of the NCP (SP) and Lok Sabha MP, has been particularly vocal, demanding a thorough probe and a white paper on the scheme. She has questioned the government's initial verification process, asking how such a large number of ineligible beneficiaries, including men, were approved in the first place. Sule has also vowed to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to ensure accountability.
Another prominent opposition leader, Sanjay Raut of the Shiv Sena (UBT), has gone so far as to call the fraud "vote chori," suggesting that the government had deliberately enrolled fake beneficiaries to garner votes.
The government, for its part, has sought to manage the crisis by emphasizing that the findings are preliminary and that a physical verification drive is underway. Women and Child Development Minister Aditi Tatkare has assured that no eligible beneficiary will lose her stipend. She stated that the benefits for the flagged accounts have been temporarily suspended and will be reinstated once the physical verification confirms their eligibility. She also confirmed that appropriate action, including the recovery of funds, will be taken against those found to have wrongfully availed benefits.
The Verification Process: A Herculean Task
The task of physically verifying 26 lakh beneficiaries is a monumental undertaking for the state administration. The preliminary list of flagged beneficiaries has been sent to district authorities, who will now have to go door-to-door to verify the details. This process is expected to be time-consuming and labor-intensive, but it is deemed necessary to ensure the scheme’s integrity.
Officials will check family income records, Aadhaar card and bank account details, and employment status. They will also look for beneficiaries who may be availing multiple government schemes simultaneously. The government has stressed that the process is aimed at ensuring that the funds reach only those who are genuinely in need.
The Larger Context: Welfare Schemes and Accountability
The "Ladki Bahin Yojana" controversy is not an isolated incident. Across India, state and central governments have launched numerous direct benefit transfer (DBT) schemes to empower citizens and reduce poverty. While these schemes have been largely successful in their objective of ensuring that benefits reach the intended recipients, they are not immune to fraud and misuse.
The Maharashtra case highlights the critical importance of a robust and foolproof verification mechanism. While technology like AI and data analytics can help to identify discrepancies on a massive scale, the ultimate responsibility for ensuring accountability lies with the administration. The controversy also raises questions about the political use of welfare schemes, with critics arguing that the rush to enroll a large number of beneficiaries before elections can compromise the integrity of the process.
The outcome of the physical verification drive will have significant political and social ramifications. For the government, a successful and transparent process could help it regain public trust. For the opposition, the issue is a powerful political tool that they will likely use to corner the government in the upcoming political cycles. Most importantly, for the 26 lakh women whose names have been flagged, the coming weeks will be a period of anxiety and uncertainty, as they await the outcome of the verification that will determine whether they are "Ladki Bahin" or "Ladki Bahar.
0 Comments